Hello,
Has anyone else compared WRF (chem turned off) and WRF-Chem meteorology fields (i.e., u, v, T, slp, etc.) before? I expected the chemical processes, reactions, etc. to somewhat change the meteorology fields. However, I thought the chemistry would have "minor" effects on the meteorology field. To my surprise, my WRF-Chem TC simulation had a minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) approximately 40 hPa weaker than the exact same WRF TC simulation with chemistry turned off. The location of the TC also was misplaced greatly with the chemistry turned on.
Thoughts? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
I didn't find the right solution from the internet.
References:
http://forum.wrfforum.com/viewtopic.php=41&t=9781
Industrial Animation Video
Has anyone else compared WRF (chem turned off) and WRF-Chem meteorology fields (i.e., u, v, T, slp, etc.) before? I expected the chemical processes, reactions, etc. to somewhat change the meteorology fields. However, I thought the chemistry would have "minor" effects on the meteorology field. To my surprise, my WRF-Chem TC simulation had a minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) approximately 40 hPa weaker than the exact same WRF TC simulation with chemistry turned off. The location of the TC also was misplaced greatly with the chemistry turned on.
Thoughts? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks
I didn't find the right solution from the internet.
References:
http://forum.wrfforum.com/viewtopic.php=41&t=9781
Industrial Animation Video
Commentaire